Magic Software Americas
For the Product Leader · GM · Head of Product Line

The spec is locked. The cost of making it is still open.

You own the P&L for this product line, and most of its margin is about to be decided by a process design you didn't write. Capacity, yield and unit cost get fixed when the equipment is bolted down. Until then, all three are still negotiable.

The Window

The window closes when the equipment gets bolted down.

High-growth product lines hit their capture moment once. The engineering work that determines whether you can serve that moment happens months earlier, in a process design conversation product leaders usually find out about after it's settled.

This is the last point where optimizing is cheap. After the concrete dries, you live with what you built.

What the clock is actually doing

  • Your competitors are optimizing their processes before their equipment gets bolted down. The ones who skip it ship at a worse unit cost for the life of the line.
  • Every week of delay in the decision is a week of launch volume you don't get back, and the launch window is the whole investment case.
  • Once the manufacturing line is locked in, you live with its capacity ceiling. Not for a quarter — for the product's life.
  • The companies that will set the price in your category are making these decisions in the same quarter you are.
The Promise

We don't just validate the design. We squeeze capacity out of it.

Most process consulting is defensive: prove the design is adequate and move on. We're after one thing — the most revenue capacity you can extract from every manufacturing dollar you are about to spend. Typical gains run 10–15%+ in throughput and yield on lines that already exist. On a line that hasn't been built yet, nothing is bolted down, so there is more room.

What most consultants optimize for

A design that passes review.

  • Optimize for compliance and cost-cutting
  • Validate the design that was handed to them
  • Treat manufacturing as a constraint to satisfy
  • Measure success in efficiency, not in units you can sell

What we optimize for

A line that can serve the demand you forecast.

  • Optimize for revenue capacity per dollar of capital
  • Change the design while changing it is still cheap
  • Treat the process as part of the product's competitive position
  • Measure success in capacity you can actually serve demand with
Six Weeks, Three Phases

Six weeks to a process design you can take to capital.

The alternative is eighteen months of explaining why a competitor got to the volume first. You can stop after any phase and the deliverable still stands on its own.

01

Assess

Weeks 1-2

A full read of the product requirements, the launch timeline and the scaling plan. We name every capacity constraint in the proposed design while it is still a drawing rather than a permanent feature of your cost structure.

What you receive

  • Every capacity constraint named and ranked
  • The launch timeline tested against the design
  • An honest read on what the line can and cannot serve
02

Validate

Weeks 3-4

Simulation of production scenarios, ramp-up sequences and multi-facility scaling against your real mix. We optimize for throughput and for the fastest credible path to full-rate production, not for a tidy steady-state number.

What you receive

  • Simulated ramp and steady-state scenarios
  • Throughput and yield optimized against your mix
  • A scaling path if the second facility is coming
03

Optimize

Weeks 5-6

The deliverable: a manufacturing design that has been validated, capacity-maximized and costed, ready to hand to procurement. Fixes live in the drawings, where they are a line item instead of a change order.

What you receive

  • A procurement-ready process design
  • Cost impact quantified per recommendation
  • The unit-cost consequence of each option, stated
Proof

Leaders who moved while the design was still changeable.

The current client portfolio is Fortune 500 leaders in medical devices, life sciences, food and beverage and consumer products — companies that decided not to gamble a launch window on an unoptimized process.

01 / 03

“Are you stuck in the rut of change we all go through? Is your company thinking of taking the next step in transformation? If so, hands down, this is a GREAT group to work with for all your digital manufacturing and transformational needs! The Axiom group are the real deal, with decades of experience in all areas of manufacturing between them. They can help you and your company reach your goals, showing quick wins with their “start small scale big” approach.”
TT

Trane Technologies

Fortune 500 · WSJ Top 250 Best Managed

Magic Consulting was formerly branded Axiom Manufacturing Systems. Client quotes are reproduced as given.

Why we take twelve a year

We only take twelve process design projects a year.

This isn't a commodity service. The method requires our senior team's direct involvement from the first week to the last, so we cap the client load deliberately rather than staff around it. Three engagements are open in the current quarter.

If the timing is tight, tell us on the call. We would rather say no early than take a launch window we can't serve properly.

Who sits on the engagement

  • OT engineering, enterprise integration, application development, AI and operational strategy under one P&L — nothing subcontracted.
  • 1,900+ automation projects and 30+ years of controls engineering behind the process recommendations.
  • A recommendation that isn't tied to a product line, including ours. Magic Consulting recommends the right tool, not necessarily a Magic tool.
The 90-Day Reality Check

Two paths out of this quarter. You are already on one of them.

Path 1 — status quo

Keep debating the trade-offs.

Manufacturing proceeds with a good-enough process design, because they have a date too. You hope the capacity ceiling doesn't bind before demand does. If it binds first, the conversation with leadership is about why a competitor moved faster — and the honest answer is that nobody tested the assumption.

Path 2 — test it now

Spend six weeks before the capital.

The constraints get named, the flows get simulated, the design gets changed on paper, and you launch on a line built for the volume you actually forecast. The capital number may not change at all — what changes is what it buys you.

Read Next

A margin you can't see is a margin you can't defend.

Designing the line is half of it. The other half is knowing what each unit actually costs to make once the line is running — which standard cost will not tell you. Cost genealogy ties machine events, production and quality data to the ledger, so the unit cost in your model is the unit cost on the floor.

If you have ever defended a product line's margin with a number that turned out to be an allocation, that page is the one to read.

Make the Numbers True

Also worth your time

  • Connect What You Already Own

    If the new line has to hand data to an ERP, a WMS and a quality system that already disagree with each other, read this before procurement.

  • How Magic Consulting works

    The engagement model behind all of this: Assess, Target, Execute, Sustain — with a measured before and a measured after.

  • Take the readiness quiz

    Ten minutes, no sales call, and it will tell you whether the constraint is really the process design or something upstream of it.

Set the margin now. Not at the first cost review.

Tell us the product, the launch date and where the process design currently stands. We'll tell you on the call how much of the cost structure is still movable — and if the answer is “not much,” we'll say so instead of selling you six weeks.